Share of councils in the higher exposure band, by disadvantage

SEIFA disadvantage decile	LGAs	Median index score	LGAs in the higher-exposure band	Share in the higher-exposure band
1-2 most disadvantaged	72	56.33	31	43%
3-4	102	52.74	33	32%
5-6	97	50.39	22	23%
7-8	98	48.55	23	23%
9-10 least disadvantaged	96	42.73	7	7%

Councils that sit the other way round

Pattern	Council	State	SEIFA decile	National rank	Index score /100	Three biggest drivers
Well-off, but high exposure	Moonee Valley	VIC	9	64	64.43	Caring burden, Need for assistance, Limited English
Well-off, but high exposure	Kingston (Vic.)	VIC	9	78	62.71	Limited English, Volunteering, Need for assistance
Well-off, but high exposure	Maroondah	VIC	9	90	60.95	Caring burden, Limited English, Volunteering
Well-off, but high exposure	Glen Eira	VIC	10	106	59.13	Limited English, Caring burden, Need for assistance
Well-off, but high exposure	Yarra	VIC	9	109	58.92	Living alone, Limited English, Need for assistance
Well-off, but high exposure	Stirling	WA	9	112	58.77	Limited English, Living alone, Partner loss
Disadvantaged, but low exposure	Halls Creek	WA	1	334	42.82	Need for assistance, Volunteering, Community infrastructure
Disadvantaged, but low exposure	Roper Gulf	NT	1	339	42.57	Volunteering, Community infrastructure, Partner loss
Disadvantaged, but low exposure	Wyndham-East Kimberley	WA	2	352	41.66	Partner loss, Need for assistance, Volunteering
Disadvantaged, but low exposure	Carpentaria	QLD	1	380	38.79	Living alone, Community infrastructure, Volunteering
Disadvantaged, but low exposure	Coomalie	NT	2	392	37.29	Living alone, Limited English, Community infrastructure
Disadvantaged, but low exposure	West Arnhem	NT	1	431	32.18	Need for assistance, Volunteering, Community infrastructure